Update Fixed! - Gawker's Redesign Lands It In My Mobile Thematic Inconsistency Hall of Shame

Update 22-Feb-2011: I'm happy to report that Gawker Media has fixed the issue of deep links not working in mobile browsers sometime in the last couple of days. I don't know if it was in response to my post or something that happened independently but either way, Thanks Gawker!

Lifehacker Desktop -> Lifehacker Mobile

It's been been nearly two weeks since the big Gawker Media redesign on the online hand wringing over it shows no sign of winding down. On Feb 8th Gawker, Gizmodo, Deadspin, Kotaku, io9 Valleywag, Jezebel and Lifehacker all went from a traditional reverse chronological blog layout to a Magazine or News style design where the front page features a few top stories with the blog time-line relegated to a sidebar list. The new design is also a big departure technically with pages now being generated entirely using JavaScript.

The idea of the magazine format is to keep top stories in a place of prominence for as long as they are news worthy instead on having them pushed down by newer but more mundane items.

Gawker's taken a lot of heat over the changes. It's been criticized on many fronts including for being slower loading, particular on old PCs; harder to navigate and "less scannable". There's also some evidence that the redesign has reduced traffic to the sites.  Technical types have had a field day arguing whether or not the sites' reliance on JavaScript and use of  "hash bang" URLs are reliable and performant.

Personally I like the redesign, at least on the desktop. I haven't seen any performance problems on either my modern low end laptop running Ubuntu or a five year old Windows XP desktop. Magazine style layouts are hardly new or unusual and are used by many top news and gossip blogs including TechCrunch, OMG and the Huffington Post.  The new layout makes sense to me for showcasing the sort of sensationalist top stories that are the Gawker sites trademark.

But there is something  about the Gawker redesign that I am really annoyed with. Gawker has essentially killed their mobile sites with this change. If you are using any mobile browser, clicking a link to Gawker Media story posted on Twitter or another site will take you the Gawker (DeadSpin, Lifehacker, etc.) mobile front page rather than to the item you were expecting. For example the Lifehacker cheap printer ink story (image top left) is a featured item on the desktop homepage. Its permalink is lifehacker.com/#!5763914/when-you-should-and-shouldnt-buy-cheap-printer-ink Opening that link in a mobile browser loads the Lifehacker mobile front page (image top right) with the ink piece nowhere to be found.

That's breaking Thematic Consistency, the principle that a URL should lead to essentially the same content (reformatted in necessary) regardless of which browser is used.  By not showing the user the content they asked for  Gawker is breaking the Web's most important feature, hyperlinking.  I suspect that the link breakage and resultant poor user experience user experience has lead to a steep reduction in mobile page views and the time that mobile users spend on the sites.

8 thoughts on “Update Fixed! - Gawker's Redesign Lands It In My Mobile Thematic Inconsistency Hall of Shame

  1. I can't be the only one still seeing this issue.

    I use the google reader app on my android handset, and everytime i click through to a gawker blog post I get served the home page. If i then trawl through the home page to find the article and click the link, I then get taken to a http://www.m.uk.lifehacker.com/blahblah page, which doesn't seem to exist. Editing the address to remove the 'uk' fixes the problem, but it has become a real hassle to try and browse gizmodo, lifehacker, kotaku through google reader. Is this a google reader problem, in terms of the way it handles the links given in the gawker rss feeds, or just a problem that remains after the redesign?
  2. From my mobile phone, when I click on a headline it takes me to a blank page. Haven't been able to read Gawker for a couple of weeks. Is it them or me?
  3. Hi Dennis, we've fixed a number of issues regarding mobile links redirecting to the mobile site home. We know that there's still an outlying bug for urls with "www" redirecting to the mobile home instead of the article. We'll be fixing this in the coming days.

    Are you still seeing issues otherwise? Can you drop me an email and let me know what mobile browser you're using and the links you're hitting?

    Cheers,
    Greg
    Gawker Product Manager
    • Thanks for you comment Greg. As I said in my update to my post everything seems to be working as expected now. I'll email if I see anymore issues. Thanks and kudos to you and you team for resolving everything so quickly.
  4. Pingback: Tweets that mention Gawker’s Redesign Lands It In My Mobile Thematic Inconsistency Hall of Shame | Wap Review -- Topsy.com

  5. What made Gawker unique and worthy of multiple visits was the site's irreverently funny and engaging commentators. Luckily, a great number of them are now at crasstalk.com

    Gawker will remain a ghost town for quite some time to come.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>